My father was no Tiger Woods, but he did share one thing in common with the golf legend - his passion for women. While my father's story had little in common with Woods, the effect of his actions on what many thought to be the perfect family had similar repercussions.
Which leads me to the inevitable question: Why would someone who seemingly has it all - the perfect family, wife, kids, lifestyle and career - risk it all on a fling?
Scott Bedbury (of Nike and Starbucks fame) said that a great brand is "an emotional connecting point that transcends the product." To Bedbury, a great brand is a "story that's never completely told" - a metaphorical story in essence that's constantly evolving. If this is true, then brand Tiger is a true brand as the plot continues to unfold with new allegations of infidelity appearing on an almost daily basis.
In the world of PR and crisis management, experts know that the best way to face the public in the wake of scandal is to address things head on - and quickly. The fact that Woods has made himself scarce only feeds the tabloid machine and leaves room for future speculation.
Will this type of behaviour and reaction damage brand Tiger and affect his current and future endorsements? Noone knows for sure, but the gaps and inconsistencies in his reaction to the "crisis" leave room for others to rewrite the brand story. It's up to Woods and his team to deal with the situation and present it in the best possible light. If not, fans and the media will take it upon themselves to write (and possibly finish) his brand story - a chance he shouldn't be willing to take.
From a brand perspective, do you think Woods has taken appropriate action to defend his reputation and brand? If a true brand tells a story, then how would you deal with this issue to present the story in the best possible light?